The Kroc Institute’s Peace Accords Matrix (PAM) — a growing interactive database featuring data on comprehensive peace agreements signed since 1989 — is increasingly being used as a tool in peace negotiations.
Faculty who are involved as advisors in high-level peace processes in several conflict zones have used PAM in meetings with secular and religious actors and government officials. (Since new peace processes are fragile, the stories of these specific cases will not be written for some time.)
“Initiating peace negotiations while violence is still ongoing is very challenging, because the parties do not trust each other,” said Madhav Joshi, research assistant professor and associate director of PAM. “In these situations, PAM is valuable in two ways. It can serve as the focus point of an educational workshop that brings both sides of the conflict to the table. It also can be used during ‘real time’ negotiations to identify and analyze different aspects of peace accords that have been used in other regions around the world.”
PAM makes it possible to compare and contrast 50 different components of comprehensive peace agreements, ranging from “disarmament, demobilization and reintegration” to “human rights provisions” and “international verification of the peace process.”
It also provides the implementation status for each component. The interactive matrix makes comparisons rapidly and accurately, Joshi said, which can help overcome obstacles that otherwise might cause negotiations to stall. Since most peace processes fall apart in the first few years, speed in accessing reliable data during complex negotiations is essential to keep the process moving forward.
While hundreds of peace agreements are developed each year, fewer than 40 worldwide are "comprehensive" — defined as a written document produced through negotiated process in which the major parties in the conflict are involved and all the substantive issues underlying the dispute are included in the negotiation process.
Twenty-eight comprehensive peace accords (CPAs) are currently available to the public on the Peace Accords Matrix. All of these have been researched at the Kroc Institute and ratified by at least 2 local experts. Another 10 CPAs are in the process of being researched.
Initially developed with a grant from the United States Institute of Peace under the direction of John Darby, PAM is designed for use by scholars, policymakers, peacebuilders, and journalists. Joshi populates and manages the database — this year with research assistance from Matthew Chandler, Ph.D. student in sociology and peace studies — while contributing to collaborative research on peace accords and processes.
Contact: Madhav Joshi, Madhav.R.Joshi.firstname.lastname@example.org, 574-631-8819