Catholic News Service, Jan. 19, 2006
By John Thavis
ROME (CNS) -- The story of the Catholic Church's embrace
of religious liberty may have relevance to the current internal
struggles of the Muslim world, said a U.S. expert on church
affairs.
Scott Appleby, director of the Joan B. Kroc Institute
for International Peace Studies at the University of Notre
Dame in Indiana, told a Rome conference Jan. 17 that internal
pluralism exists in Islam and "this is good news."
"It's
good news for Islam that there are competing traditions and
voices and interpretations of what 'jihad' might mean and
how it might be applied," he said.
He cited the emergence
of courageous Muslims who speak about the options of nonviolence
in Islam, about democratization and about acceptance of a
pluralistic society.
It's a long process, but this kind of
internal debate ultimately opens up alternatives to violence,
he said. Ultimately, he said, demographic and economic pressures
favor the pluralists in the Islamic world.
Appleby's speech
detailed the internal evolution within the Catholic Church
that led to the Second Vatican Council's Declaration on Religious
Freedom ("Dignitatis Humanae.") That document said religious
liberty is a human right and that people should not be forced
to act in a way contrary to their beliefs.
Appleby noted
that an 1832 encyclical by Pope Gregory XVI described religious
freedom as "madness." But dialogue continued in the church,
and the Vatican II decree can be described as the product
of internal pluralism at work, he said.
"By any reasonable
assessment, 'Dignitatis Humanae' was a striking reversal,
by which the church abandoned its previous claims to political
privilege, renounced the theocratic model of political order,
and laid the groundwork for its new role as global proponent
of religious liberty and universal human rights," Appleby
said.
The conference, sponsored by the U.S. Embassy to the
Holy See, also featured speeches by Cardinal Theodore E.
McCarrick of Washington and James Towey, director of the
White House Office for Faith-Based and Community Initiatives.
Cardinal McCarrick said two fundamental premises of "Dignitatis
Humanae" were the dignity of the human person and the proposition
that constitutional limits should be set on the powers of
government to prevent encroachment on religious freedom and
practice.
He praised a succession of steps by the U.S. government
and Congress to protect religious freedom at home and abroad.
But, responding to a question, the cardinal also identified
a new danger to religious freedom in the United States: legislative
attempts to impose on church institutions "that which we
cannot morally do."
"I see this as a growing threat," Cardinal
McCarrick told the Rome audience.
He said one example was
trying to oblige Catholic hospitals to offer abortion procedures;
another was an effort to require church agencies to provide
spousal benefits to unmarried employees.
In Maryland in 2003,
Cardinal McCarrick and Cardinal William F. Keeler of Baltimore
promised to go to jail rather than obey a law on sex abuse
reporting that would have required priests to break the seal
of confession.
Towey argued that the concept of a strict
separation between church and state in the United States
is often exaggerated. He pointed out that the phrase "a wall
of separation between church and state" is not found in the
U.S. Constitution, but in a letter of Thomas Jefferson --
a man who, two days after writing the phrase, attended Sunday
church services in a federal building.
Towey said the constitutional
clause saying there should be no law respecting an establishment
of religion did not mean to install "ruthless secularization" in
society.
He said the Bush administration has rightly moved
away from the banishment of anything religious from the
public square, while respecting four important principles:
no favoritism,
no discrimination, no funding of inherently religious activity
and no coercion.
Top
of Page
Home
> In the News > U.S. expert: Catholic history could be
relevant to Muslim struggles