Philpott Brings Interest in Religion and Politics
to Core Faculty
Daniel Philpott, the newest member of Kroc Institute’s
Core Faculty, will bring fresh insights into the relationship
between religion and politics to the Institute. Philpott
holds a joint appointment as Assistant Professor in Government
and International Studies.
Philpott is not a newcomer at Notre Dame. In 1998-99, he
spent a year on campus as a visiting fellow at the Erasmus
Institute. He also held a visiting appointment at Princeton
in 1995-96 after completing his doctorate at Harvard in 1995.
Philpott’s first book focuses on the role of ideas in the
historical development of sovereignty. Revolutions in
Sovereignty: How Ideas Shaped Modern International Relations was
released by Princeton University Press in March 2001.
“The topic was essentially answering the question: How did
the world ever get to be organized into sovereign states,” he
explains. “The book focuses on two historical episodes: first,
the formation of the sovereign state system in early modern
Europe that culminated in the Peace of Westphalia in 1648,
and second, the decline of the colonial empires during the
20th century that culminated around 1960. The latter development
resulted in the expansion of the sovereign state system around
the globe.”
“One of the things that made me want to look at this was
the fact that sovereignty is (now) becoming compromised and
circumscribed.” Two major influences, he says, are behind
the current challenges to sovereign states. “One is the ongoing
extension of the European Union. The other is the increasing
incidence of humanitarian intervention in the internal affairs
of various nations.”
What has intrigued many about Philpott’s point of view is
the bold case he makes for the central role of ideas — particularly
religious ideas — in the evolution of sovereign states. While
military and economic power cannot be overlooked, only the
power of ideas can adequately explain the creation of a world
of sovereign states, he argues.
That interplay of religious ideas in politics has particularly
preoccupied Philpott. He is a member of a scholarly working
group promoting the study of religion and politics. Directed
by Harvard’s Samuel Huntington, it includes scholars from
across the United States.
Recently, Philpott’s scholarship has turned to issues of
reconciliation. “The subject of reconciliation in politics
is one that I now want to address in an academic way,” Philpott
comments. “Reconciliation has many layers, and it must involve
justice, accountability and truth-telling. I am interested
in exploring the larger question of how societies deal with
past injustices or evils.”
A recent convert to Catholicism, Philpott has been deeply
impressed by Pope John Paul II. The pope’s contributions
in bringing the language of reconciliation and forgiveness
into the broader social context have not yet been fully appreciated
or explored, he says.
In 1996, a five-day visit to war-torn Sarajevo deepened
Philpott’s commitment to exploring issues of political recon-ciliation.
Traveling as part of an international team, he observed the
devastating impact of war and was impressed by discussions
of reconciliation by diplomats, religious leaders and relief
workers from Islamic, Catholic and Serbian Orthodox traditions.
Philpott plans to continue field research on reconciliation
in other conflict settings.
Top
of Page
Home > Publications > Peace
Colloquy > Issue 1 (Spring 2002)